Nothing to see here
Aug. 19th, 2010 05:43 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
If you're somehow reading this, be advised that this is only a placeholder journal that I never read, check, or update. I do my blogging over at LiveJournal (I know, like, so uncool amirite?) also under the name oceanstater.
http://oceanstater.livejournal.com/
http://oceanstater.livejournal.com/
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-20 04:40 am (UTC)Was the cake a reference to Huckel's rule?
main screen turn on
Date: 2010-08-20 09:31 pm (UTC)I truly never look at this thing, because I had no idea that we had given each other mutual access on DW, hah. I completely forgot where it was that you had wandered off to (this was during one of my avoiding online socialization periods), and by the time I checked up on your LJ it was baleeted.
I only created this entry because an LJ friend had referenced my journal apparently while posting via DW because it used the DW icon and linked to my dead account here. I wanted to correct anyone who followed the link, and lo, it has already had a salutary effect! :)
It's hard enough for me to compose and share my thoughts on a personal blog; if I had to learn some dual-posting procedure and follow two separate sets of comments and friends it would be impossible. Not to mention my scores of userpics, which are an important form of self-expression for me, and I am REALLY not paying for two journals to host said userpics.
I wish there was some way I could let you read my LJ entries, which are 99% friends-only. Do you have an OpenID? (One comes automatically with LJ, and I would assume with DW as well.) If you leave a comment on one of my public entries using your OpenID, I can then add you and let you read locked entries — or at least that's how I parsed the LJ FAQ.
No hard feelings if you would rather not make awkward accommodations to read my journal, I've made essentially the same choice. I just wish you could read my recent entries about botany and gender expression and whatnot.
And yes, it was a reference to Hückel's rule. :)
Re: main screen turn on
Date: 2010-08-21 12:08 am (UTC)Aaaand I have more to say, but there's some laundry that I don't want to air here so I'm going to move the rest to PM.